Truth, Proof, Rights and the Rule of Law in Criminal Adjudication

A Comment on Sarah Summers «Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial: Truth, Proof and Rights»

Autores/as

  • John Dugald Jackson University of Nottingham

Resumen

A comment on S. J. Summers «Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial: Truth, Proof and Rights»

Palabras clave

proof, rights, criminal adjudication, truth, rule of law

Citas

BINGHAM, T. (2010). The Rule of Law. Penguin.

BOTTOMS, A. and TANKEBE, J. (2012). Beyond Procedural Justice: A Dialogic Approach to Legitimacy in Criminal Justice. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(1), p. 119-170.

DENNIS, I. (2003). Fair Trials and Safe Convictions. Current Legal Problems, 56(1), p. 211-237.

DUFF, A., FARMER, L., MARSHALL, S. and TADROS, V. (2007). The Trial on Trial (Volume 3: Towards a Normative Theory of the Trial). Hart Publishing.

FERRER BELTRÁN, J. (2021). Proven Facts, Beliefs and Reasoned Verdicts. In C. DAHLMAN, A. STEIN, G. TUZET (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Evidence Law. Oxford University Press.

FRANK, J. (1949). Courts on Trial: Myth and Reality in American Justice. Princeton University Press.

GETTIER, E.L. (2006). Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Analysis, 23, p. 121-123.

HO, H.L. (2021). Evidence and Truth. In C. DAHLMAN, A. STEIN, G. TUZET (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Evidence Law. Oxford University Press.

HODGSON, J. (2020). The Metamorphosis of Criminal Justice. Oxford University Press.

GREENFIELD, N. (2022). Shinn v Martinez Ramirez: Making a Mockery of the Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel. Oxford Human Rights Hub 27 June.

JACOBSON, J. and COOPER, P. (eds.) (2020). Participation in Courts and Tribunals. Bristol University Press.

JACKSON, J.D. (2016). Unbecoming Jurors and Unreasoned Verdicts: Realising Integrity in the Jury Room. In J. HUNTER, P. ROBERTS, S. N. M. YOUNG, D. DIXON (eds.), The Integrity of Criminal Process. Hart.

JACKSON, J.D. (2019). Common Law Evidence and the Common law of Human Rights: Towards a Harmonic Convergence. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 27(3), p. 689-715.

JACKSON, J.D. (2021). Protecting the Right to a Fair Trial in an Era of Criminal Justice Transformation. In B. DICKSON and C. MCCORMICK (eds.), The Judicial Mind: A Festschrift for Lord Kerr of Tonaghmore. Bloomsbury Publishing.

JACKSON, J.D. and ROBERTS., P. (2019). Beyond Common Law Evidence: Reimagining, and Reinvigorating, Evidence Law as Forensic Science. In D. K. BROWN, J. I. TURNER, B. WEISSER (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Process. Oxford University Press.

JACKSON, J.D. and SUMMERS, S.J. (2012). The Internationalisation of Criminal Evidence. Cambridge University Press.

JACKSON, J.D. and WEIGEND, T. (2021). Witness Evidence in Pre-Trial and Trial Procedure. In K. AMBOS, A. DUFF, A. HEINZE, J. ROBERTS, T. WEIGEND (eds.), Core Concepts in Criminal Law and Criminal Justice (Volume II). Cambridge University Press.

LEVANON, L. (2019). Statistical Evidence, Assertions and Responsibility. Modern Law Review, 82(2), p. 269-292.

MCCONVILLE, M. and MARSH, L. (2014). Criminal Judges on Trial: Legitimacy, Courts and State-Induced Guilty Pleas in Britain. Edward Elgar.

OWUSU-BEMPAH, A. (2017). Defendant Participation in the Criminal Process. Routledge.

PARDO, M.S. (2010). The Gettier Problem and Legal Proofs. Legal Theory, 16, p. 37-57.

ROBERTS, P. (2014). Introduction. In P. ROBERTS (ed.), Theoretical Foundations of Criminal Trial Procedure. Ashgate.

SUMMERS, S. (2022a). Trials and Punishments in the Rule of Law: The Influence of the ECHR on Criminal Law and Process. ZSR/RDS, 141(2), p. 275-354.

SUMMERS, S. (2022b). The Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial. Quaestio Facti: International Journal of Legal Reasoning, 2023(4), p. 249-271.

TWINING, W. (2006). Rethinking Evidence: Exploratory Essays (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press.

Legislation

Al-Khawaja and Tahery v UK [GC] nos 26766/05 and 22228/06, 15 December 2011

Beuze v Belgium [GC] no. 71409/10, 9 September 2018

Ibrahim and others v UK [GC] nos 50541/08, 50571/08, 50573/08, 40351/09, 13 September 2016

ICTY Statute. Art 21.1

ICTR Statute. Art 20.1

ICC Statute. Art 67

Shinn v Ramirez, 596 US ___ (2022)

R v Brown and others [2012] NICA 14

R v King (2000) 2 Cr App R 391, 402

T v R [2022] EWCA Crim 108 [219](e)

Taxquet v Belgium [GC] no. 926/05, 16 November 2010

DOI

https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i5.22838

Publicado

2023-04-12

Cómo citar

Jackson, J. D. (2023). Truth, Proof, Rights and the Rule of Law in Criminal Adjudication: A Comment on Sarah Summers «Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial: Truth, Proof and Rights». Quaestio Facti. Revista Internacional Sobre Razonamiento Probatorio, (5), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i5.22838